MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Marc Polmans [436th] vs Li Tu [172nd] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Polmans 2 - 0 Tu

They have played 5 sets in total, with Polmans winning 4 and Tu winning 1. The last match between Polmans and Tu was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 14-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Marc Polmans getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Marc Polmans 2
Li Tu 0
Polmans vs Tu H2H Profile
Polmans Stats Tu
43% (3-4) YTD Win/Loss 50% (9-9)
2 Head-to-Head 0
436 Ranking 172
116 Highest Rank 168
27 Age 28
R Plays -
13 Titles 10
55% (344-280) Career Total W/L 62% (198-121)
$642,775 Career Prize Money $356,930
1 Hard H2H 0
1 Indoor H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Polmans VS Tu H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
Marc Polmans
Player
Li Tu
66% ( 38 of 58)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
87% ( 33 of 38)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 25 of 35)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 10 of 18)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 15 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 18 of 53)
61
Total Points Won
50
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3
cross
Marc Polmans
Player
Li Tu
61% ( 56 of 92)
1st Serve %
55% ( 70 of 128)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
68% ( 38 of 56)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 41 of 70)
58% ( 21 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 28 of 58)
27% ( 6 of 22)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
36% ( 33 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 59 of 128)
118
Total Points Won
102

Polmans VS Tu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Polmans Vs Tu H2H Stats
Marc Polmans Polmans Stats Li Tu Tu
2 H2H Matches 0
4 Sets Won 1
30 Games Won 19
13 Aces (Total) 14
6 Total Double Faults 8
1:54:8 Average Match Time 1:54:8
63% (94/150) 1st Serve % 58% (105/181)
76% (71/94) 1st Serve Win % 63% (66/105)
55% (31/56) 2nd Serve Win % 50% (38/76)
32% (8/25) Break Points Won % (Total) 33% (2/6)
43% (77/181) Return Points Win % 32% (48/150)
100% (2/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (1/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Marc Polmans vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Polmans 2 - 0 Tu

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Polmans has won 45.27% of points on their second serve, while Tu has won 43.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Polmans, in recent form, has won 52.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 46.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.58% and 22.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Polmans has saved 52.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 53.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Polmans has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 20/ 24), with Tu winning 55.71% (W/L 39/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 98/ 74), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 141/ 77), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 14/ 12).
  • Player level: In the last year, Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15), where as Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.35% of matches (W/L 25/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Polmans winning 2 times and Tu being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Polmans winning 4 and Tu winning 1. The last match between Polmans and Tu was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 14-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Marc Polmans getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:8.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Polmans and Tu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Polmans winning 1 times and Tu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Polmans winning 0, and Tu 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Polmans has played against opponents with an average rank of 301.11 while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 251.03.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Polmans has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Polmans has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 31.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Marc Polmans
    Player
    James Tracy
    69% ( 41 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 44 of 67)
    4
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    83% ( 34 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 31 of 44)
    50% ( 9 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    30% ( 7 of 23)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    27% ( 16 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 29 of 67)
    72
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Karl Poling
    Player
    Marc Polmans
    62% ( 53 of 85)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 54 of 78)
    4
    Aces
    7
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    68% ( 36 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 38 of 54)
    56% ( 18 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    36% ( 31 of 85)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 31 of 78)
    85
    Total Points Won
    78
    L
    6-4 3-6 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Marc Polmans
    Player
    Benjamin Willwerth
    73% ( 56 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 42 of 68)
    2
    Aces
    5
    5
    Double Faults
    0
    70% ( 39 of 56)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 27 of 42)
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    58% ( 15 of 26)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    35% ( 27 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 26 of 68)
    76
    Total Points Won
    69
    W
    7-6(5) 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Blaise Bicknell
    Player
    Marc Polmans
    72% ( 55 of 76)
    1st Serve %
    69% ( 46 of 67)
    1
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    6
    67% ( 37 of 55)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 28 of 46)
    38% ( 8 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 6 of 21)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    41% ( 31 of 76)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 33 of 67)
    78
    Total Points Won
    65
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Thomas Braithwaite
    Player
    Marc Polmans
    73% ( 93 of 127)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 82 of 116)
    20
    Aces
    15
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    73% ( 68 of 93)
    1st Serve Won
    77% ( 63 of 82)
    53% ( 18 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 13 of 34)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    7% ( 1 of 15)
    32% ( 41 of 127)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 40 of 116)
    126
    Total Points Won
    117
    L
    6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Marc Polmans
    Player
    Jack Bruce-Smith
    69% ( 36 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 30 of 62)
    3
    Aces
    9
    4
    Double Faults
    4
    86% ( 31 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    80% ( 24 of 30)
    50% ( 8 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 14 of 32)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    25% ( 13 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 24 of 62)
    63
    Total Points Won
    51
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Valentin Royer
    Player
    Marc Polmans
    65% ( 33 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 21 of 35)
    11
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    85% ( 28 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 12 of 21)
    50% ( 9 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 5 of 14)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    27% ( 14 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 18 of 35)
    55
    Total Points Won
    31
    L
    6-3 6-0 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Yosuke Watanuki
    Player
    Marc Polmans
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 28 of 39)
    7
    Aces
    0
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    88% ( 15 of 17)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    41% ( 9 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    64% ( 7 of 11)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    38% ( 15 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    41
    Total Points Won
    37
    L
    7-5 ret. H2H
    R2
    cross
    Hikaru Shiraishi
    Player
    Marc Polmans
    69% ( 53 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 50 of 87)
    1
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    10
    66% ( 35 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 30 of 50)
    42% ( 10 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 15 of 37)
    40% ( 6 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    42% ( 32 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 42 of 87)
    87
    Total Points Won
    77
    L
    3-6 6-1 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Marc Polmans
    Player
    Edward Winter
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 38 of 56)
    5
    Aces
    1
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    81% ( 26 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 18 of 38)
    80% ( 8 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 10 of 18)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    19% ( 8 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 28 of 56)
    62
    Total Points Won
    36
    W
    6-2 6-2 H2H

    Li Tu Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Hyeon Chung
    Player
    Li Tu
    59% ( 51 of 87)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 65 of 105)
    4
    Aces
    5
    6
    Double Faults
    3
    75% ( 38 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 43 of 65)
    39% ( 14 of 36)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 14 of 40)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    40% ( 35 of 87)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 48 of 105)
    100
    Total Points Won
    92
    L
    3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Li Tu
    Player
    Marat Sharipov (RUS)
    63% ( 55 of 88)
    1st Serve %
    44% ( 30 of 68)
    5
    Aces
    7
    6
    Double Faults
    2
    78% ( 43 of 55)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 21 of 30)
    42% ( 14 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 20 of 38)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    9% ( 1 of 11)
    35% ( 31 of 88)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 27 of 68)
    84
    Total Points Won
    72
    W
    6-2 3-6 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Eliot Spizzirri
    Player
    Li Tu
    71% ( 44 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 44 of 61)
    2
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    82% ( 36 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 29 of 44)
    44% ( 8 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 7 of 17)
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    29% ( 18 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 25 of 61)
    69
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Li Tu
    Player
    Giulio Zeppieri
    77% ( 33 of 43)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 38 of 57)
    6
    Aces
    7
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    88% ( 29 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 24 of 38)
    80% ( 8 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 9 of 19)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    14% ( 6 of 43)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 24 of 57)
    61
    Total Points Won
    39
    W
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Li Tu
    Player
    Adrian Mannarino
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 41 of 58)
    4
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    90% ( 28 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 26 of 41)
    55% ( 12 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 7 of 17)
    100% ( 4 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    25% ( 13 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 25 of 58)
    65
    Total Points Won
    46
    W
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dusan Lajovic
    Player
    Li Tu
    76% ( 34 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    46% ( 21 of 46)
    1
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    79% ( 27 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 13 of 21)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 7 of 25)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    29% ( 13 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    57% ( 26 of 46)
    58
    Total Points Won
    33
    L
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Li Tu
    Player
    James Duckworth
    53% ( 27 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 32 of 67)
    2
    Aces
    5
    1
    Double Faults
    8
    78% ( 21 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 14 of 35)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    33% ( 17 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 33 of 67)
    67
    Total Points Won
    51
    W
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Li Tu
    Player
    Adrian Mannarino
    64% ( 43 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 30 of 52)
    6
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    0
    79% ( 34 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 18 of 30)
    50% ( 12 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    68% ( 15 of 22)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    31% ( 21 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 19 of 52)
    65
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Arthur Cazaux
    Player
    Li Tu
    49% ( 30 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 34 of 61)
    13
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    6
    80% ( 24 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 20 of 34)
    52% ( 16 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 11 of 27)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    34% ( 21 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 30 of 61)
    70
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Omar Jasika
    Player
    Li Tu
    67% ( 60 of 90)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 49 of 79)
    13
    Aces
    10
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    68% ( 41 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    78% ( 38 of 49)
    57% ( 17 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    36% ( 32 of 90)
    Rtn Points Won
    33% ( 26 of 79)
    84
    Total Points Won
    85
    L
    2-6 7-5 6-2 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Polmans & Tu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Marc Polmans Polmans Stats Li Tu Tu
    55% (344/280) Win/Loss 62% (198/121)
    54% (795/681) Sets Win/Loss 60% (436/292)
    52% (7203/6707) Games Win/Loss 54% (3688/3177)
    0.26 Aces Per Game 0.43
    1776 Aces Total 1430
    0.26 Double Faults Per Game 0.18
    1797 Total Double Faults 616
    1:32:17 Average Match Time 1:19:36
    483.99 Average Opponent Rank 367.69
    65% (25717/39302) 1st Serve % 61% (11016/17961)
    68% (17416/25717) 1st Serve Win % 73% (8007/11016)
    50% (6748/13585) 2nd Serve Win % 52% (3638/6945)
    43% (1722/4039) Break Points Won % (Total) 42% (759/1786)
    40% (16062/39805) Return Points Win % 39% (7291/18467)
    55% (333/601) Best of 3 Sets Win % 63% (198/315)
    47% (7/15) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/4)
    49% (91/186) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 52% (53/102)
    52% (112/214) Deciding Set Win % 57% (48/84)
    85% (339/287) 1st Set Won, Won Match 90% (189/170)
    15% (339/52) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 10% (189/18)
    20% (283/57) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 22% (130/28)

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    14:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...